![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() So those are the two major reasons I would consider or have you guys consider to switch to SecureAnywhere. So that in itself was one of our biggest reasons. So you don't have to wait for the whole evening to finish the scan. Webroot’s antivirus scanner detected 93.1 of my malware samples during testing, and all scans took approximately 5 minutes to complete but I did notice some lag during the scans while I was browsing. If you are considering using SecureAnywhere either primarily or as an add-on or as a replacement for a current AV provider, then I would definitely take this into under consideration, one, the small footprint, two, the speed at which it scans. Webroot’s scanner is very fast and lightweight, but it’s not as good as competing antivirus products. So on a scale of one to five, five was where we think the ease of integration was. The second was that the deployment and the management were fairly easy. So it was already part of their offering. So we didn't have to work with three different parties to try to make these things work. It was, I would say, fairly easy for us to onboard and integrate SecureAnywhere because one, it was already pre-integrated with our RMM vendors. So they don't have to keep doing this over and over again. They just intelligently keep a record of all of the files that have already been scanned. They use a newer version of a database where they don't have to keep downloading software. And the scans were extremely, extremely quick. Rubenking Updated Ap(Credit: Webroot) The Bottom Line Though it no longer offers remote configuration and its ransomware protection is imperfect, Webroot. The other one was that it's a very short, sorry, very small footprint. One is its integration with our RMM provider, the remote monitoring management provider. There are multiple reasons why we opted for SecureAnywhere. So before switching to SecureAnywhere, we were using Symantec Endpoint Protection and McAfee in our client base. And for more reviews like this, click below. It causes problems with network browsing and network virtualization with both VirtualBox and VMware Fusion, and it results, for some reason, in systemwide UI slowdowns, which suggest to me that there may be some elemental problems with the codebase: use of deprecated APIs, memory leaks, etc.-not usable. At that point, it doesn't matter how beautiful the interface may be: antimalware software which lets common malware through is essentially useless.Īlso, while there is an OS X client, it's buggy and slow. I discovered that Webroot, though fully deployed and set to monitor downloads, warn on browsing, and scan the affected directories, simply had not alerted on anything. One employee at the affected client's office was able to download three separate third-party software installers containing malware payloads on a Saturday, install them, and work for a full weekend before I arrived back on Monday to complaints that her machine was being "slow and weird". This is obviously a Big Deal in a product billed as enterprise-grade antivirus/antimalware. Cons: In my experience, Webroot, though the exposed end is fast and well-designed, does not reliably block or detect common threats. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |